Home›Services›Email Security Architecture

Email security architecture for complex and multi-vendor environments.

Design, review and optimize secure, resilient and scalable email architectures across cloud, on-premises and hybrid environments with practical, hands-on expertise.

A vendor-neutral approach

Architecture decisions based on your environment, requirements and supported platforms—not a single vendor’s product catalogue.

Proofpoint
Microsoft 365
Cisco
Other email security platforms
  • Objective architecture review and design guidance
  • Security, resilience and business requirements considered together
  • Single-vendor and multi-vendor environments supported where in scope

What we help you achieve

We work with IT, security and messaging teams to design, review and optimize email security architectures for real-world environments.

Architecture design and review

Assess your current environment and design a secure, resilient and scalable email architecture aligned to your requirements.

Security controls and authentication

Design SPF, DKIM, DMARC, TLS and related domain-protection controls within the overall email architecture.

Multi-vendor and hybrid deployments

Design and integrate supported solutions across Proofpoint, Microsoft 365, Cisco Secure Email and connected mail platforms.

Migration and coexistence planning

Plan mail-flow, connector and coexistence dependencies during migrations, cutovers and hybrid transitions.

Mail flow, routing and connector design

Design secure routing, connectors, policy boundaries and mail-flow paths across cloud, on-premises and hybrid environments.

Resilience and operational readiness

Design for continuity, supportability and operational clarity with documented dependencies, controls and recovery considerations.

Typical email security architecture

A representative multi-vendor architecture showing how email can pass through security layers to Microsoft 365 and users. Actual design depends on your environment, platforms and requirements.

External
InternetInbound and outbound email and threats
Security layer(s)
proofpoint.Email Security Gateway
(cloud or on-premises)
CISCOCisco Secure Email
(where used)
Additional controls
as required by the environment
Cloud / Internal
Microsoft 365Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Anti-spam and anti-malware
Anti-phishing and impersonation protection
Transport rules and policy enforcement
Reputation and threat intelligence
Users
Internal usersOutlook, mobile and web
External recipientsPartners and customers

Our architecture consulting process

A structured approach to design, review and optimize your email security architecture.

1

Understand

Review your current environment, business requirements, constraints and objectives.

2

Analyze

Assess architecture, security controls, mail flow, dependencies and potential gaps.

3

Design

Develop the target architecture, recommended controls and an implementation approach.

4

Implement / Assist

Support agreed deployment, configuration and integration activities where required.

5

Validate & Document

Confirm the design works as intended and provide clear documentation and knowledge transfer.

Example: Architecture review scenario

An illustrative example showing how we review and improve a hybrid email security architecture.

Environment
Hybrid Exchange and Microsoft 365 with Proofpoint in the mail path
Requirement
Secure and reliable mail flow between Proofpoint and Exchange Online
Issue
TLS and mail-flow failures between the secure email gateway and Exchange Online
Investigation
Reviewed connectors, certificate requirements, mail flow, logs and policy settings
Finding
The presented TLS certificate name did not match the hostname expected by the connector policy
Resolution
Updated the connector TLS certificate configuration, validated certificate trust and confirmed successful end-to-end mail flow
Path: Internet → Proofpoint → Exchange Online
Transport security: TLS required
Connector policy: certificate trust + expected name
Observed: TLS negotiation failed during secure delivery
Finding: certificate name did not match the expected TLS hostname
Connector: Secure email gateway → Microsoft 365
TLS mode: Required
Expected TLS hostname: mail.security.example
Certificate trust: validation required
Source ranges: reviewed against gateway configuration
STARTTLS advertised
TLS handshake initiated
Certificate chain presented and evaluated
Certificate name mismatch detected
Secure delivery attempt rejected by connector policy
Finding: TLS certificate identity did not satisfy connector policy
Action: certificate / connector settings corrected
Validation: certificate trust and hostname checks passed
Result: end-to-end secure mail flow confirmed

What you receive

Clear findings, practical recommendations and hands-on support appropriate to the scope of the engagement.

Architecture documentation

Documented current-state findings, target architecture, key dependencies and design recommendations.

Configuration guidance

Practical guidance for connectors, routing, authentication, TLS and other agreed controls.

Validation results

Confirmation that the agreed mail flow and relevant security controls behave as expected.

Knowledge transfer

Walkthrough of findings, architecture decisions and operational considerations with your team.

Implementation support

Hands-on assistance with agreed deployment, configuration, integration or migration activities where implementation support forms part of the engagement.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about our email security architecture consulting services.

What types of email environments do you support?

Architecture engagements can cover supported cloud, on-premises and hybrid email environments, including Microsoft 365, Proofpoint, Cisco Secure Email and related mail-flow components where they are within the agreed scope.

Can you help with SPF, DKIM, DMARC and TLS design?

Yes. Where relevant to the engagement, these controls can be reviewed as part of the overall architecture, mail-flow and domain-protection design.

Can you design a multi-vendor email security architecture?

Yes, where the platforms involved are within our supported scope. The design can consider mail flow, security boundaries, connectors, authentication, resilience and operational dependencies across the environment.

Do you provide implementation support or only recommendations?

Both can be considered. An engagement may cover architecture review and recommendations only, or include agreed implementation, validation, documentation and knowledge-transfer activities.

Do you assist with migrations and coexistence?

Yes, where the requirement involves supported mail-flow, connector, coexistence or cutover dependencies across cloud, on-premises or third-party email security systems.

How is your approach different from vendor professional services?

Our architecture work is centered on the overall email environment and agreed business and technical requirements rather than on implementing a single vendor’s product catalogue. The exact scope depends on the platforms and services involved.

How is an architecture consulting engagement scoped?

Engagements are scoped according to the environment, architecture complexity, number of platforms, objectives and level of implementation support required. Once the requirements are understood, the proposed scope and commercial terms can be defined clearly before work begins.

Need help with your email security architecture?

Whether you need a new design, a review of your current environment or help with a specific project, we can help you build a secure, resilient and supportable email architecture.

Discuss Your Requirement